Sorting system
Number of patents in Portfolio can not be more than 2000
United States of America Patent
Stats
-
Jul 1, 1980
Grant Date -
N/A
app pub date -
Sep 19, 1978
filing date -
Oct 8, 1971
priority date (Note) -
Expired
status (Latency Note)
![]() |
A preliminary load of PAIR data current through [] has been loaded. Any more recent PAIR data will be loaded within twenty-four hours. |
PAIR data current through []
A preliminary load of cached data will be loaded soon.
Any more recent PAIR data will be loaded within twenty-four hours.
![]() |
Next PAIR Update Scheduled on [ ] |

Importance
|
US Family Size
|
Non-US Coverage
|
Patent Longevity
|
Forward Citations
|
Abstract
A method is disclosed of sorting data in an electronic data processing system utilizing a digital computer and at least one random access device such as, for example, a magnetic disc or drum unit. A first simulation is performed to optimize the utilization of the resources of the data processing system. This simulation is based on information relating to characteristics of the data processing system available to the sorting function as well as known or predicted information concerning the data to be sorted. The input data is ordered into a plurality of strings of data which are generated by a selection technique known as quadratic selection replacement. The number of strings generated is minimized by determining if data bias exists, and if unfavorable or negative bias is discovered, the order of string generation is reversed. The ordered strings of data are written into random access storage in sets of ordered data blocks with each block having at least one link each to the data blocks logically positioned in front and in back thereof so that the logical position of each block in the string is well defined. After the initial string generation phase has been completed, the sequence in which the now existing strings will be selected for merging into fewer strings is computed so that the data in the strings will be manipulated a minimum number of times. The data blocks of the merged strings are then read into the working storage area of the digital computer where the data blocks are merged into still fewer strings. The working storage area is divided into a record hold area and generally, at least three buffers, an input buffer, an output buffer, and an active buffer from which the data is transferred into and from the record hold area. The order in which the data blocks already in the working storage area will become exhausted is maintained and hence the order in which new data blocks will be required is anticipated before they are needed. Thus, the read-write heads (hereinafter referred to as readheads) in the random access storage devices can be positioned at the proper track location for reading a required block before the block is needed. This is one result of the synchronization of read and write operations which thereby reduces the input/output time. This merge process is repeated until the number of strings has been reduced to a number equal to the order of the final merge. That number of strings is then read from the random access storage area into the working storage area of the computer and again merged until only one string or set of strings remains which string or set of strings contains the input data ordered in the desired sequence.
First Claim
Family
- 15 United States
- 10 France
- 8 Japan
- 7 China
- 5 Korea
- 2 Other
Patent Owner(s)
- SYNCSORT INCORPORATED;WHITLOW COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.
International Classification(s)
Inventor(s)
| Inventor Name | Address | # of filed Patents | Total Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sasson, Azra | New York, NY | 1 | 64 |
| Whitlow, Duane L | Hillsdale, NJ | 1 | 64 |
Cited Art Landscape
- No Cited Art to Display

Patent Citation Ranking
Forward Cite Landscape
- No Forward Cites to Display

Maintenance Fees
| Fee | Large entity fee | small entity fee | micro entity fee | due date |
|---|
| Fee | Large entity fee | small entity fee | micro entity fee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surcharge after expiration - Late payment is unavoidable | $700.00 | $350.00 | $175.00 |
| Surcharge after expiration - Late payment is unintentional | $1,640.00 | $820.00 | $410.00 |
Full Text
Legal Events
Matter Detail
Update Public Data
Dismiss
Edit
Save
Renewals Detail
Edit
Save
Note
The template below is formatted to ensure compatibility with our system.
Provide tags with | separated like (tags1|tags2).
Maximum length is 128 characters for Customer Application No
Mandatory Fields * - 'MatterType','AppType','Country','Title','SerialNo'.
Acceptable Date Format - 'MM/DD/YYYY'.
Acceptable Filing/App Types -
- Continuation/Divisional
- Original
- Paris Convention
- PCT National
- With Priority
- EP Validation
- Provisional Conversion
- Reissue
- Provisional
- Foreign Extension
Acceptable Status -
- Pending
- Abandoned
- Unfiled
- Expired
- Granted
Acceptable Matter Types -
- Patent
- Utility Model
- Supplemental Protection Certificate
- Design
- Inventor Certificate
- Plant
- Statutory Invention Reg
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recipient Email Address
Recipient Email Address
Comment
Recipient Email Address
Success
E-mail has been sent successfully.
Failure
Some error occured while sending email. Please check e-mail and try again!
PAIR load has been initiated
A preliminary load of cached data will be loaded soon. Current PAIR data will be loaded within twenty four hours.
File History PDF
Thank you for your purchase! The File Wrapper for Patent Number 4210961 will be available within the next 24 hours.
Add to Portfolio(s)
To add this patent to one, or more, of your portfolios, simply click the add button.
This Patent is in these Portfolios:
Add to additional portfolios:
Last Refreshed On:
Changes done successfully
Important Notes on Latency of Status data
Please note there is up to 60 days of latency in this Status indicator for certain status conditions. You can obtain up-to-date Status indicator readings by ordering PAIR for the file.
An application with the status "Published" (which means it is pending) may be recently abandoned, but not yet updated to reflect its abandoned status. However, an application filed less than one year ago is unlikely to be abandoned.
A patent with the status "Granted" may be recently expired, but not yet updated to reflect its expired status. However, it is highly unlikely a patent less than 3.5 years old would be expired.
An application with the status "Abandoned" is almost always current, but there is a small chance it was recently revived and the status not yet updated.
Important Note on Priority Date data
This priority date is an estimated earliest priority date and is purely an estimation. This date should not be taken as legal conclusion. No representations are made as to the accuracy of the date listed. Please consult a legal professional before relying on this date.
We are sorry but your current selection exceeds the maximum number of portfolios (0) for this membership level. Upgrade to our Level for up to -1 portfolios!.
