Methods of fabricating grating assisted coupler devices
Number of patents in Portfolio can not be more than 2000
United States of America Patent
Stats
-
Oct 15, 2002
Grant Date -
N/A
app pub date -
Oct 31, 2000
filing date -
Aug 26, 1996
priority date (Note) -
Expired
status (Latency Note)
![]() |
A preliminary load of PAIR data current through [] has been loaded. Any more recent PAIR data will be loaded within twenty-four hours. |
PAIR data current through []
A preliminary load of cached data will be loaded soon.
Any more recent PAIR data will be loaded within twenty-four hours.
![]() |
Next PAIR Update Scheduled on [ ] |

Importance
|
US Family Size
|
Non-US Coverage
|
Patent Longevity
|
Forward Citations
|
Abstract
Advantageous methodologies are disclosed for embedding periodic patterns in optical waveguide elements such as optical fibers. Polarization independence in an elongated waist region of a coupler can be established by measuring polarization characteristics during fusion and elongation, and controlling the heating and stretching to impart a cross-sectional shape, such as a hybrid dumbbell-ellipsoid produces a polarization insensitive drop wavelength. Alternatively, or additionally, polarization dependence can be minimized by angular deformation of the elements along its light transmissive axis. In addition, an element of relatively low photosensitivity is held in an hydrogen or deuterium environment pressurized to about 1000 to 5000 psi. While the environment is pressurized, a scanning UV beam is transmitted through a photomask and impinges on the coupler waist. In writing the grating, the in-diffused gas is constantly replenished, enabling the grating to grow. Prior to writing the periodic pattern dimensional variations in the element which can affect spectral bandwidth are sensed by writing a test pattern in the element and then locally measuring the spectral properties of the test pattern progressively along the element and adjusting the local level of background index of refraction so that the modal index of refraction is substantially constant, minimizing imperfections in the precision of the wavelength pattern. The scanning writing beam, which can be of substantially larger cross-sectional dimensions than the waveguide element (which may be in the 4-10 micron range) is caused to track on the element despite positional imprecision and temporal shifting by using fluorescence induced in the elements to provide an error signal for positive correction. To apodize the grating in accordance with a selected function, a constant power beam is directed through a rotating half-wave plate and into a polarizing beam splitter, where it is divided into two beams having oppositely varying d.c. amplitude characteristics. One beam is varied by a periodic pattern, and the other beam is free of a periodic pattern. Alternately, a scanner toggles the constant intensity beam between the two beam paths in rapid succession, varying the duty cycle of toggling as the beams scan along the coupler waist to produce the desired apodization profile of the grating.
First Claim
Family
- 15 United States
- 10 France
- 8 Japan
- 7 China
- 5 Korea
- 2 Other
Patent Owner(s)
| Patent Owner | Address | |
|---|---|---|
| ARROYO OPTICS INC | 1646 17TH STREET SANTA MONICA CA 90404 |
International Classification(s)
- [Classification Symbol]
- [Patents Count]
Inventor(s)
| Inventor Name | Address | # of filed Patents | Total Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engin, Doruk | Santa Monica, CA | 13 | 97 |
| Greenberg, Seth J | Los Angeles, CA | 2 | 55 |
| Kewitsch, Anthony S | Hacienda Heights, CA | 26 | 1331 |
| Rakuljic, George A | Santa Monica, CA | 20 | 1076 |
| Tong, Xiaolin | Pasadena, CA | 25 | 209 |
| Willems, Phil A | Pasadena, CA | 4 | 97 |
Cited Art Landscape
- No Cited Art to Display

Patent Citation Ranking
Forward Cite Landscape
- No Forward Cites to Display

Maintenance Fees
| Fee | Large entity fee | small entity fee | micro entity fee | due date |
|---|
| Fee | Large entity fee | small entity fee | micro entity fee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surcharge after expiration - Late payment is unavoidable | $700.00 | $350.00 | $175.00 |
| Surcharge after expiration - Late payment is unintentional | $1,640.00 | $820.00 | $410.00 |
Full Text
Legal Events
Matter Detail
Update Public Data
Dismiss
Edit
Save
Renewals Detail
Edit
Save
Note
The template below is formatted to ensure compatibility with our system.
Provide tags with | separated like (tags1|tags2).
Maximum length is 128 characters for Customer Application No
Mandatory Fields * - 'MatterType','AppType','Country','Title','SerialNo'.
Acceptable Date Format - 'MM/DD/YYYY'.
Acceptable Filing/App Types -
- Continuation/Divisional
- Original
- Paris Convention
- PCT National
- With Priority
- EP Validation
- Provisional Conversion
- Reissue
- Provisional
- Foreign Extension
Acceptable Status -
- Pending
- Abandoned
- Unfiled
- Expired
- Granted
Acceptable Matter Types -
- Patent
- Utility Model
- Supplemental Protection Certificate
- Design
- Inventor Certificate
- Plant
- Statutory Invention Reg
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recipient Email Address
Recipient Email Address
Comment
Recipient Email Address
Success
E-mail has been sent successfully.
Failure
Some error occured while sending email. Please check e-mail and try again!
PAIR load has been initiated
A preliminary load of cached data will be loaded soon. Current PAIR data will be loaded within twenty four hours.
File History PDF
Thank you for your purchase! The File Wrapper for Patent Number 6465153 will be available within the next 24 hours.
Add to Portfolio(s)
To add this patent to one, or more, of your portfolios, simply click the add button.
This Patent is in these Portfolios:
Add to additional portfolios:
Last Refreshed On:
Changes done successfully
Important Notes on Latency of Status data
Please note there is up to 60 days of latency in this Status indicator for certain status conditions. You can obtain up-to-date Status indicator readings by ordering PAIR for the file.
An application with the status "Published" (which means it is pending) may be recently abandoned, but not yet updated to reflect its abandoned status. However, an application filed less than one year ago is unlikely to be abandoned.
A patent with the status "Granted" may be recently expired, but not yet updated to reflect its expired status. However, it is highly unlikely a patent less than 3.5 years old would be expired.
An application with the status "Abandoned" is almost always current, but there is a small chance it was recently revived and the status not yet updated.
Important Note on Priority Date data
This priority date is an estimated earliest priority date and is purely an estimation. This date should not be taken as legal conclusion. No representations are made as to the accuracy of the date listed. Please consult a legal professional before relying on this date.
We are sorry but your current selection exceeds the maximum number of portfolios (0) for this membership level. Upgrade to our Level for up to -1 portfolios!.
