Carriage for an unmanned aerial vehicle including a latch and an electronic driver to move a locking shaft latch
United States of America
Stats

Importance

US Family Size
|
Non-US Coverage
|
Abstract
An example carriage is configured for mounting to an unmanned aerial vehicle. The carriage generally includes a housing assembly configured for mounting to the unmanned aerial vehicle, a movable grip mounted to the housing assembly for movement between a capturing position and a releasing position, a latch device, and a driver. The latch device has a latching state and an unlatching state, is configured to retain the movable grip in the capturing position when the latch device is in the latching state, and is configured to permit movement of the movable grip from the capturing position to the releasing position when in the unlatching state. The driver is operable to transition the latch device from the latching state to the unlatching state.

First Claim
Family

- 15 United States
- 10 France
- 8 Japan
- 7 China
- 5 Korea
- 2 Other
Country Designations

Patent Owner(s)
Patent Owner | Address |
---|---|
AERO VELOCITY INC | Not Provided |
International Classification(s)
- B64F:GROUND OR AIRCRAFT-CARRIER-DECK INSTALLATIONS
- G08G:TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G05D:SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC....
- B64D:EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLYING SU....
- B66D:CAPSTANS; WINCHES; TACKLES, e.g. PULLEY BLOCKS; HO....
- B64C:AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B60L:ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT OR PROPULSION OF ELECTRICALLY-P....

- [Classification Symbol]
- [Patents Count]
Inventor(s)
Inventor Name | Address |
---|---|
WEI WEI | LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION ATTENTION IP DEPARTMENT 5823 NEWTON DRIVE CARLSBAD CALIFORNIA 92008 92008 |
RATAJCZAK JAY | MAINEVILLE OH |
ZHANG HAONAN | MASON OH |
BORT THADDEUS | LOVELAND OH |
Cited Art Landscape
- No Cited Art to Display

Full Text

Legal Events

Matter Detail

Renewals Detail

Add to Portfolio(s)
To add this patent to one, or more, of your portfolios, simply click the add button.
This Patent is in these Portfolios:

Add to additional portfolios:

Note
The template below is formatted to ensure compatibility with our system.
Provide tags with | separated like (tags1|tags2).
Maximum length is 128 characters for Customer Application No
Mandatory Fields * - 'MatterType','AppType','Country','Title','SerialNo'.
Acceptable Date Format - 'MM/DD/YYYY'.
Acceptable Filing/App Types -
- Continuation/Divisional
- Original
- Paris Convention
- PCT National
- With Priority
- EP Validation
- Provisional Conversion
- Reissue
- Provisional
- Foreign Extension
Acceptable Status -
- Pending
- Abandoned
- Unfiled
- Expired
- Granted
Acceptable Matter Types -
- Patent
- Utility Model
- Supplemental Protection Certificate
- Design
- Inventor Certificate
- Plant
- Statutory Invention Reg
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Recipient Email Address

Recipient Email Address

Comment
Recipient Email Address

Success
E-mail has been sent successfully.
Failure
Some error occured while sending email. Please check e-mail and try again!
Important Notes on Latency of Status data
This Status indicator is an estimation based on the relevant document kind code. As such, it status will only indicate "Published" or "Granted". Expired, lapsed or abandoned statuses are not available in this release. Please refer to the legal status information for more information.
This status should not be taken as legal conclusion. No representations are made as to the accuracy of the status provided. Please consult a legal professional before relying on this status information.
Important Note on Priority Date data
This priority date is an estimated earliest priority date and is purely an estimation. This date should not be taken as legal conclusion. No representations are made as to the accuracy of the date listed. Please consult a legal professional before relying on this date.
Only for Granted EP cases
EP validations represent the countries in which the EP patent may be in force. Data is based on reporting from the various EP contracting states. The reporting consistency can vary across the countries.