NETTING WITH ELONGATION INDICATOR AND METHOD OF DETERMINING THE ELONGATION OF NETTING
World Intellectual Property Organization Patent
Stats

Importance

WO Family Size
|
Non-US Coverage
|
Abstract
A knitted netting for wrapping an object is provided. When wrapping the object the knitted netting may have an indicated target elongation. The knitted netting includes first longitudinal franzes, first lateral schusses, at least two second longitudinal franzes, and at least one second lateral schuss. The schusses are knitted with the franzes to form the knitted netting. The first longitudinal franzes and the first lateral schusses are configured such that the spacing of the first longitudinal franzes decreases by less than 10% when elongating the knitted netting by 50%) of the target elongation, the target elongation being from 15% to 300% of the length of the knitted netting. The second lateral schuss is an indicator schuss. The second longitudinal franzes are indicator franzes. The indicator schuss is knitted with the indicator franzes to form an elongation indicator for indicating the amount of longitudinal stretching of the knitted netting. The elongation indicator is configured such that the spacing of the indicator franzes decreases by more than 10% when elongating the knitted netting by 50% of the target elongation. Further, a method of determining the longitudinal elongation of such a knitted netting with respect to a target elongation is provided.

First Claim
Family

- 15 United States
- 10 France
- 8 Japan
- 7 China
- 5 Korea
- 2 Other
Country Designations

Patent Owner(s)
Patent Owner | Address |
---|---|
TAMA PLASTIC IND | ILISRAEL HA EMCKE |
International Classification(s)
Inventor(s)
Inventor Name | Address |
---|---|
LIEBER YUVAL | KIBBUTZ GALED |
EFRATI YAIR | KIBBUTZ MISHMAR HA'EMEK |
Cited Art Landscape
- No Cited Art to Display

Full Text

Legal Events

Matter Detail

Renewals Detail

Add to Portfolio(s)
To add this patent to one, or more, of your portfolios, simply click the add button.
This Patent is in these Portfolios:

Add to additional portfolios:

Note
The template below is formatted to ensure compatibility with our system.
Provide tags with | separated like (tags1|tags2).
Maximum length is 128 characters for Customer Application No
Mandatory Fields * - 'MatterType','AppType','Country','Title','SerialNo'.
Acceptable Date Format - 'MM/DD/YYYY'.
Acceptable Filing/App Types -
- Continuation/Divisional
- Original
- Paris Convention
- PCT National
- With Priority
- EP Validation
- Provisional Conversion
- Reissue
- Provisional
- Foreign Extension
Acceptable Status -
- Pending
- Abandoned
- Unfiled
- Expired
- Granted
Acceptable Matter Types -
- Patent
- Utility Model
- Supplemental Protection Certificate
- Design
- Inventor Certificate
- Plant
- Statutory Invention Reg
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Recipient Email Address

Recipient Email Address

Comment
Recipient Email Address

Success
E-mail has been sent successfully.
Failure
Some error occured while sending email. Please check e-mail and try again!
Important Notes on Latency of Status data
This Status indicator is an estimation based on the relevant document kind code. As such, it status will only indicate "Published" or "Granted". Expired, lapsed or abandoned statuses are not available in this release. Please refer to the legal status information for more information.
This status should not be taken as legal conclusion. No representations are made as to the accuracy of the status provided. Please consult a legal professional before relying on this status information.
Important Note on Priority Date data
This priority date is an estimated earliest priority date and is purely an estimation. This date should not be taken as legal conclusion. No representations are made as to the accuracy of the date listed. Please consult a legal professional before relying on this date.
Only for Granted EP cases
EP validations represent the countries in which the EP patent may be in force. Data is based on reporting from the various EP contracting states. The reporting consistency can vary across the countries.