CONTINUOUS DECONTAMINATION DEVICE
World Intellectual Property Organization Patent
Stats

Importance

WO Family Size
|
Non-US Coverage
|
Abstract
Provided is a continuous decontamination device which uses a decontamination agent such as hydrogen peroxide, which has been widely used in recent years, without using a high-priced electron accelerator, and is capable of achieving treatment in a short amount of time while achieving a uniform decontamination level at each section and thus is capable of batch treatment of articles to be decontaminated. This continuous decontamination device is provided with a device body that has a decontamination region and an aeration region, a conveyance means that conveys an article, a mist supply means, and an aeration means. The conveyance means changes the section at which the article is supported inside the decontamination region when supporting and conveying the article fed from a feed opening to a discharge opening. The entire outer surface of the article can thus be decontaminated. The mist supply means is equipped with an ultrasonic atomizer that converts the decontamination agent into a decontamination agent mist, and causes the decontamination agent mist to act on the article conveyed inside the decontamination region concentrating on the outer surface of the article. The aeration means removes the decontamination agent mist remaining on the outer surface of the article with clean gas.

First Claim
Family

- 15 United States
- 10 France
- 8 Japan
- 7 China
- 5 Korea
- 2 Other
Country Designations

Patent Owner(s)
Patent Owner | Address |
---|---|
AIREX CO LTD | JPNAGOYA-SHI AICHI 453-0015 |
International Classification(s)
Inventor(s)
Inventor Name | Address |
---|---|
KAWASAKI KOJI | NAGOYA-SHI AICHI 453-0015 |
OGATA YOSHITAKA | NAGOYA-SHI AICHI 453-0015 |
KAKUDA DAISUKE | NAGOYA-SHI AICHI 453-0015 |
Cited Art Landscape
- No Cited Art to Display

Full Text

Legal Events

Matter Detail

Renewals Detail

Add to Portfolio(s)
To add this patent to one, or more, of your portfolios, simply click the add button.
This Patent is in these Portfolios:

Add to additional portfolios:

Note
The template below is formatted to ensure compatibility with our system.
Provide tags with | separated like (tags1|tags2).
Maximum length is 128 characters for Customer Application No
Mandatory Fields * - 'MatterType','AppType','Country','Title','SerialNo'.
Acceptable Date Format - 'MM/DD/YYYY'.
Acceptable Filing/App Types -
- Continuation/Divisional
- Original
- Paris Convention
- PCT National
- With Priority
- EP Validation
- Provisional Conversion
- Reissue
- Provisional
- Foreign Extension
Acceptable Status -
- Pending
- Abandoned
- Unfiled
- Expired
- Granted
Acceptable Matter Types -
- Patent
- Utility Model
- Supplemental Protection Certificate
- Design
- Inventor Certificate
- Plant
- Statutory Invention Reg
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Recipient Email Address

Recipient Email Address

Comment
Recipient Email Address

Success
E-mail has been sent successfully.
Failure
Some error occured while sending email. Please check e-mail and try again!
Important Notes on Latency of Status data
This Status indicator is an estimation based on the relevant document kind code. As such, it status will only indicate "Published" or "Granted". Expired, lapsed or abandoned statuses are not available in this release. Please refer to the legal status information for more information.
This status should not be taken as legal conclusion. No representations are made as to the accuracy of the status provided. Please consult a legal professional before relying on this status information.
Important Note on Priority Date data
This priority date is an estimated earliest priority date and is purely an estimation. This date should not be taken as legal conclusion. No representations are made as to the accuracy of the date listed. Please consult a legal professional before relying on this date.
Only for Granted EP cases
EP validations represent the countries in which the EP patent may be in force. Data is based on reporting from the various EP contracting states. The reporting consistency can vary across the countries.