i m a g e

Help and Advice for Start Ups, New Ventures, Inventors & Entrepreneurs

Forum

Patent Owner Analytics

Feb 15, 2011 

If you are trying to research companies you may want to partner with or license or sell your invention to, check out Patent Buddy's IP Owner analytics -- either on the site (Innovator pages) or using Patent Buddy's free iPhone app.  Analytics include the number of US patents owned by each company, their top technology area, their top patent and top inventor.  US patents are also rated based on the number of times they are mentioned in later patents.

By checking the patent portfolios of potential business partners you can get a feel for how much value they place on patents and the type of patents they are interested in. 

 

Director Kappos Posts Documents Summarizing Patent Prosecution Highway Programs and Three Track Examination Proposal

Oct 7, 2010 

The following two documents summarize the features of the Patent Prosecution Highway programs and the Three Track Examination proposal.

The key features of the three track examination proposal are the ability to:

1) accelerated examination - applicants pay a "cost recovery fee" to get on this track

2) normal examination

3) delayed prosecution - applicants can request to delay exam up to 30 months

Note that the new proposed accelerated exam track would NOT appear to require the same onerous requirements of the existing accelerated exam track 

Three Track Examination

The prosecution highway programs all provide ways that most of the world's largest patent offices can share each other searches and examinations, in various different ways.  The main advantage to applicants is to speed the examination process.  The advantage to the participating patent offices is to reduce workload.

Prosecution Highway Programs

Software Innovators -- Don't be Fooled by Anti-Software Patent Rhetoric

Sep 13, 2010 

As I explained on my blog www.patents4software.com, which is repeated in a posting on Patent Buddy today, anti-software patent critics grossly distort the reality of the negatives of software patent protection, and overlook their potential high value to those software companies that succeed and need to protect their product from being "annexed" by a software giant.

Read more on my blog or my Patent Buddy posting.

Inventors of Internet Advertising Schemes Beware

Aug 27, 2010 

If you are an inventor looking to protect an invention involving a method of Internet-based advertising, you need to be concerned. In the Ultramercial, LLC et al. v. Hulu, LLC, et al., decision, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held invalid just such a patent on the basis that it was attempting to claim an abstract advertising concept.

The inventions at issue (US Patent 7,346,545) are both expressly claimed as methods for distribution of products over the Internet and are clearly and unequivocably limited to use with the Internet, an Internet web site and interactive messages.  Although the claim could be more explicit, it would also be reasonable to interpret many of the steps specified in the claims as Internet-implemented.  Notwithstanding the express limitations tying the invention to an Internet implementation, the Court found that the claims were not "meaningfully" limited to machine implementation and, accordingly, did not pass muster under the machine prong of the machine or transformation test. The claims also failed the transformation test as well according to the Court.

The key take-away from this case is to make sure that your patent attorney carefully limits the claims of advertising methods to machine-implementation and also where possible include a clear "transformation" of data, and also to make sure that the invention is claimed as a "machine" as well as a method.

Here are claims 1 and 8 from the '545 patent (emphasis added):

1. A method for distribution of products over the Internet via a facilitator, said method comprising the steps of:

a first step of receiving, from a content provider, media products that are covered by intellectual-property rights protection and are available for purchase, wherein each said media product being comprised of at least one of text data, music data, and video data;

a second step of selecting a sponsor message to be associated with the media product, said sponsor message being selected from a plurality of sponsor messages, said second step including accessing an activity log to verify that the total number of times which the sponsor message has been previously presented is less than the number of transaction cycles contracted by the sponsor of the sponsor message;

a third step of providing the media product for sale at an Internet website;

a fourth step of restricting general public access to said media product;

a fifth step of offering to a consumer access to the media product without charge to the consumer on the precondition that the consumer views the sponsor message;

a sixth step of receiving from the consumer a request to view the sponsor message, wherein the consumer submits said request in response to being offered access to the media product;

a seventh step of, in response to receiving the request from the consumer, facilitating the display of a sponsor message to the consumer;

an eighth step of, if the sponsor message is not an interactive message, allowing said consumer access to said media product after said step of facilitating the display of said sponsor message;

a ninth step of, if the sponsor message is an interactive message, presenting at least one query to the consumer and allowing said consumer access to said media product after receiving a response to said at least one query;

a tenth step of recording the transaction event to the activity log, said tenth step including updating the total number of times the sponsor message has been presented; and

an eleventh step of receiving payment from the sponsor of the sponsor message displayed.

8.  A method for distribution of products over the Internet via a facilitator, said method comprising the steps of:

a first step of providing a product list on an Internet website, wherein at least some of the products are media products covered by intellectual property rights protection and are available for purchase, said media products being provided by content providers, wherein each said media product is comprised of at least one of text data, sound data, and video data;

 a second step of selecting a sponsor message to be associated with at least one of said media products, said sponsor message being selected from a plurality of sponsor messages, said second step including accessing an activity log to verify that the total number of times which the sponsor message has been previously presented is less than the number of transaction cycles contracted by the sponsor of the sponsor message;

 a third step of restricting general public access to said media products;

 a fourth step of offering to a consumer access to a requested media product available for purchase without charge to the consumer on the precondition that the consumer views the sponsor message;

 a fifth step of receiving from the consumer a request to view a sponsor message in response to said step of offering;

 a sixth step of facilitating the display of a sponsor message to the consumer in response to receiving the request;

 a seventh step of, if the sponsor message is not an interactive message, allowing said consumer access to said requested media product after said step of facilitating the display of said sponsor message;

 an eighth step of, if the sponsor message is an interactive message, presenting at least one query to the consumer and allowing said consumer access to said media product after receiving a response to said at least one query;

 a ninth step of recording the transaction event to the activity log, said ninth step including updating the total number of times the sponsor message has been presented; and

 a tenth step of receiving payment from the sponsor of the sponsor message displayed.

For more information on this case visit my blog at www.patents4software.com

Steve

Inventing Our Way Out of Joblessness

Aug 7, 2010 

Check out a great article by former patent appeals Judge Michel.

He asserts that small businesses create jobs and that small businesses need patents to get funding.  He is advocating getting the Patent Office the funding it needs to catch up on the patent backlog, plus a tax credit for small businesses that get a patent.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/06/opinion/06nothhaft.html?_r=1

Steve

Using Patent Analytics to Size Up an Opportunity

Jul 20, 2010 

Many times an inventor will seek a patentability opinion as a first step in deciding whether to file for a patent.  Another quick and relatively inexpensive way to help with this process, and in sizing up opportunities for commercialization, is to perform a patent landscape analysis using a tool such as that provided by Innography -- www.innography.com.  Lanscaping reports can give an inventor a feel for how crowded a technology is with other patents (crowded is not usually good) and also provide ideas for companies active in the area that may want to license an inventor's technology.

I have attached a a Powerpoint on patent landscaping if you are looking for more information.

PTO offers to expedite examination in exchange for abandoning another application

Dec 10, 2009 

On November 27, 2009, the USPTO published the "Patent Application Reduction Stimulus Plan" (74 Fed. Reg. 62285) (a PDF is found at the end of this posting). Briefly, a procedure has been established whereby a small entity applicant can have a petition to make special granted in an unexamined application that is ready for examination by submitting a request that documents that the applicant has expressly abandoned one of their co-pending applications that was also ready for examination but had not been examined. There are lots of conditions attached. The applications must be co-owned or have an inventor in common. All the fees must be paid and the applications must have actual filing dates prior to October 1, 2009.
For legal commentary on this program, visit Warren Woessner's blog at www.patents4life.com

Good article on how IP is valued

Jun 17, 2009 

If you are wondering how the valuation experts determine how much a patent is worth, check out this article from accuval.net: 

http://www.accuval.net/insights/featuredarticle/detail.php?ID=42

Techniques discussed include:

1) relief from royalty

2) excess earnings

3) cost savings

Other approaches include replacement cost or fair value.

 

BusinessWeek Names 20 Most Important Inventions of the Next 10 Years

Apr 26, 2009 

As reported in Business Week:

Innovation from Recession

BusinessWeek asked several futurists, including Futurist.com's Glen Hiemstra, consultant David Zach, and author Howard Rheingold, to describe what they'd like to see arise from the current downturn. Notably, our experts didn't think of innovation merely in terms of products or services. These ideas will change the way humans interact with the earth — and with each other.
See http://tech.msn.com/products/slideshow.aspx?cp-documentid=18821223&gt1=40000

Welcome to the Help and Advice Group!

Apr 25, 2009 

The goal of our group will be to provide help and guidance to entrepreneurial individuals and new ventures in need of free general legal IP guidance and perhaps just a sanity check (being an entrepreneur or inventor can be both rewarding and damn hard).  I welcome all questions and all the help I can get to answer the questions!  I am looking in particular for attorneys who want to help provide a high quality Q & A forum for Patent Buddy inventors.  OK, now we need a question to answer.  (No questions from attorneys please.)